Closed on Christmas??

So....I heard that my church has cancelled services on Christmas this year, being that Christmas falls on a Sunday and all. I posted a entry on Facebook about it which resulted in some good discussion which made me want to explore this more and thus--my first post in 18 months or so!

Apparently in 2005 when Christmas last fell on a Sunday, several mega-churches decided to eschew services on Christmas Day, as did our church (a definitely non-mega-church, with about 200 in attendance on an average Sunday.) I assume many churches, of all sizes, also cancelled services in 2005.

Now, in 2011, Christmas is on Sunday again and my first reaction was that church services at our church shouldn't be cancelled. I mean, isn't Christmas supposed to be about Christ and celebrating His birth and what better place to do so than church?

Or, is there a better place? Or a better time than Christmas Day, the December 25 date having more pagan roots than Christian ones, if truth be told? What's the big deal about going to church on that day, or any given Sunday, for that matter? Why should we expect anyone to work on Christmas? Think of the needed infrastructure of typical mega-church: multiple services on Christmas Eve, their enormous staffs of not just ministers but of parking lot attendants and custodians and nursery workers--maybe even double-overtime comes in to play if someone has to work on a Sunday AND a holiday. I don't know the inner-workings of a mega-church. (Actually, I don't think I want….) But shouldn’t a church, of all organizations, tell their staff "no need to work on Christmas Day" and spend time with your family instead?

I guess I don't really know why some churches cancel their services. Is it indeed because it’s too much to ask of the staff? (One of my FB friends whose husband is a music minister stated that they have 4 Christmas Eve services and 3 on Christmas Day, and yes I would agree it's way too much to expect any one person to be at all of those). Or, is it because not enough people will attend services to make it worth their while? That opening Santa's presents with the kids takes precedence on Christmas morning over attending—or leading--services?

Our church has a Christmas Eve service, usually at 5:00 PM. I haven't been to it in years since we usually host Christmas Eve dinner at our house for the relatives. Last year my family went, but I stayed home, since someone (me) has to take the turkey out of the oven. Often, none of us go and instead, spend time with out-of-town family members. I wonder if I'm being a hypocrite--I stay home Christmas Eve due to the responsibilities of hosting a big family dinner. Is that different than staying home Christmas morning if it falls on a Sunday? Or is this not about any one person’s specific schedule or family traditions but about what the church offers its congregants and community and the message it sends by having services, or not?

Some background: I go to church. My family goes. We're regulars. In fact, our kids are some of the few in our church who have nearly perfect attendance in Sunday school. My husband and I tithe. We serve on committees and lead this or teach that or help out here and there. We Are Involved In The Church. But I would never for a second credit what “good church-goers” we are with our level of faith or the strength of our relationship with God. They're related, I suppose. But, truth be known, I probably get more spiritually out of some blog entries I read than I do attending a typical Sunday morning service. (Shout out to Jamie The Very Worst Missionary here and her amazing blog as an example.)

So why does my family go to church? The answers are legion: for community, as a way to connect with other believers, because it's our tradition, for worship, for teaching, habit, for what we Christians like to call "fellowship." All of these things enter in, I suppose.

But I can't say I haven't questioned this habit of ours. Lately, in fact, many Christians are and while mega-churches still are growing (I believe), a funny little thing called home churches are also exploding in growth--where people come together and worship and learn about God without all the trappings of a typical church. Where their tithe can go directly to ministries and outreach and justice rather than a significant portion going to church building maintenance and insurance and heating bills. Where the church truly is a committed community of believers and seekers yearning to know God in a more intimate setting. I can't say there's not an appeal in that.

I read a book a while back called Pagan Christianity, which explores how almost everything that we consider to be "church" has roots, not in the New Testament church or Christ's teachings, but in pagan habits and traditions. Preachers, music, church buildings, Sunday school--you name it. It's a startling and fascinating read and can't help but make one question this thing we call "church" and its relevancy today.

Maybe that's what I'm getting at in this post. Is the church relevant today? Do we as Christians actually need “church”? And if we do (and I’d probably argue that church is indeed a good thing), then why make it less relevant by cancelling services on one of our most significant and holy holidays? If we don’t need church, then maybe it’s time to re-think this huge organizational entity we’ve established.

If we’re cancelling because the overhead and the staffing is just too burdensome, maybe we need to look at the model of a church that requires such enormous infrastructure. Maybe a church can get too big. If it’s because we know many of our congregants won’t show up, then why aren’t we cancelling church on the weekends of July 4th or Labor Day or any other typically sparsely attended Sunday?

Maybe I’m over thinking this. Maybe it’s not that big of a deal. Go to church or not on Sunday. Go to church or not on Christmas. have a service. Don't have a service. Does it even matter? Should it?

What is Christmas about anyway?

From this video, produced by James Dobson's CitizenLink divison, you'd think Christmas was about buying buying buying. The folks over at Focus on the Family seem to take great pleasure in being outraged that "Christmas" is being mentioned less and less in retailers' greetings, catalogs and ads. In fact, we Christians are supposed to find these so-called "efforts to secularize Christmas offensive."

Watch the video now.

Me? I tend to be of the thought that Christmas is about the birth of Christ, about God's gift to humanity, about worshipping a God who has literally walked among us. While we certainly celebrate Christmas in our family by doing traditional things like exchanging gifts, baking cookies and decorating a tree, I have never for a moment tried to define this holiday by what I hear and see at the mall or on the catalogs I get. But apparently Stuart Shepherd who does these "StopLight" videos (remember: he was the same guy who did the "Would it be wrong to pray for rain at the Democratic National Convention?") defines Christmas differently than I do.

Apparently getting outraged that retailers (whose customer base goes beyond just Christians, believe it or not) use a generic holiday greeting rather than "Christmas" is enough reason to be offended and boycott businesses. (yes, there's an actual list .) Personally I get more riled up about fair trade, labor practices and treatment of employees and factory workers in developing countries and so on. But those wise people over at Focus on the Family are obviously the ones who we need to turn to for our "moral compass" and "values." Because if you value celebrating the birth of Christ, what better way than to make sure that Target is saying "Christmas" and not "Holiday"?

The Great Christmas Tree Debate

We got our Christmas tree today. How is it that getting a tree on December 4th makes one feel behind? All the neighbors seem to have their trees already! I remember years ago, when I lived in NYC and I had a little tree for my studio apartment that I got on Dec 1 and I was so amazed that I got it that early and enjoyed it for over a month! I also loved looking at the tree all lit up while snuggled up all cozy in my bed--a benefit of a studio! I had a Murphy bed that transformed my living room into a bedroom and I decided I always wanted to have a Christmas tree in my bedroom. But alas, that hasn't happened since then.



But back to the tree. I had a hard time deciding this year where to get the tree. There are three main options: fake, supermarket parking lot, or U-cut. Now, I'm an Oregonian and for those of you outsiders, you may not know that Oregon is the largest producers of Christmas trees in the world with 8.2 million trees being harvested this year alone. That's a whole lotta needles there, Mabel. So, to not have a real tree is well, rather embarrassing for an Oregonian. Which is not to say we don't have a fake tree up in our attic. I'll admit it, we do. We bought it a few years ago when we were going to Minnesota for Christmas and didn't want a dead tree in the house for over a week while we were gone, and to take it down before Christmas, well, seems downright criminal! I gotta admit, fake trees with their built-in lights are sweet. Let's face it--fighting with the tangled web of lights is hardly the stuff of movies and sweet memories.



Of course we hear a lot these days about being "green" so I started to wonder what is really more green--a fake tree or a real one? I read an article in the Oregonian last week where a Christmas tree farmer said, "You'd have to be a pretty poor salesman if you couldn't make the case that one of my trees isn't a lot greener than a plastic Christmas tree from China."



Hmmm? Now, since we already own a fake tree (for the reason stated above), all the energy it takes is that of my husband dragging it down from the attic. Let's compare that how I got my tree this year: we drove to a Lees Farm, about 10 miles away. A worker there cut down a living tree using a chain saw. They loaded up on a flat bed pulled by a tractor and used a machine to shake it for loose needles and another to twine it up. And of course, there's all that energy that was used planting, nurturing, watering, feeding, pruning that tree for years. The tree does give back though--cleaner air for all of us!



But, the reality? A tree that just a few hours ago was live and growing, is now standing in our living room, shedding needles even as a I speak. And our fake tree is still in our attic.



Perhaps the best option is to just go to the parking lot sales--at least those trees are already dead and will be turned into mulch if they don't get bought. But where's the romance and tradition of the yearly family outing to...the parking lot at Freddies?



Oh, the conundrum! It's not easy being green. Last year we used the fake one. This year we cut our own and had a fun family outing (sans Dad who was at work--we didn't want to fight the crowds at the farms on the weekend nor did we have time to schlep out to a farm.) We bought farm-made donuts. We went through the hay mazes. Fun fun fun.



What's your tree opinion? What do you think is the greenest thing to do?